The effects of varied retrieval cues on reminiscence in eyewitness memory

By J. Gilbert, R. Fisher. 2006

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d41e7ef925b7577dd7c33d4eb3dcd30044900fe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Aldert Vrij
2. R. Fisher

In General Health Professions

1. Aldert Vrij

In Social Psychology

1. R. Fisher
2. Aldert Vrij
3. G. Mitchell
4. N. Brewer
5. Maria Hartwig
6. S. Porter
7. Leanne ten Brinke
8. Pär Anders Granhag

Citations in the corpus

• Interviewing to detect deception (2014, background): “This increases cognitive load because (a) it runs counter to the natural forward-order coding of sequentially occurring events and (b) it disrupts reconstructing events from a schema (Gilbert & Fisher, 2006).”
• The Relation between Consistency and Accuracy of Eyewitness Testimony: Legal versus Cognitive Explanations (2009, background): “In Gilbert and Fisher (2006), 98% of witnesses who were tested twice (189 of 192) made at least two reminiscent recollections, hardly a rare phenomenon, as suggested by the “Courtroom” theory.”