Standard Methods for Sampling North American Freshwater Fishes

By Scott A. Bonar, W. Hubert, David W. Willis. 2009

311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d3815ac69ef5d2972644921ce8b815b69bb4c19

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. C. Turner
2. K. Deiner
3. David M. Lodge
4. C. Jerde
5. M. Young
6. Nathan T. Evans
7. I. Cowx
8. S. Lochmann

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. C. Turner
2. David M. Lodge
3. K. Deiner
4. C. Jerde
5. I. Cowx
6. S. Lochmann
7. Kevin L. Pope
8. M. Young

Citations in the corpus

• Methods for Assessing Fish Populations (2010, background): “Box 11.2.”
• Stock assessment in inland fisheries: a foundation for sustainable use and conservation (2016, methodology): “One gear type can to be compared to another using developed gear calibration and comparison techniques (Peterson and Paukert 2009) or ground-truthing for comparison.”
• Fish community assessment with eDNA metabarcoding: effects of sampling design and bioinformatic filtering (2017, background): “Traditionally, assessment of fish species richness has relied on capture-based sampling of organisms via netting, trapping, or electrofishing (Murphy and Willis 1996; Bonar et al. 2009).”