A multi-component assessment model for monitoring training distress among athletes

By L. Main, R. Grove. 2009

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d31fb7ad68f11d08ece9eef7b45b676c7b719a3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Gangyan Si
2. R. Schinke
3. N. Stambulova
4. Zella E. Moore
5. Tatiana Ryba
6. Kristoffer Henriksen
7. P. Wylleman
8. Lori A. Schwanhausser

In Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

1. N. Stambulova
2. R. Schinke
3. Zella E. Moore
4. Gangyan Si
5. Kristoffer Henriksen

In Social Psychology

1. Gangyan Si
2. R. Schinke
3. N. Stambulova
4. Zella E. Moore
5. Lori A. Schwanhausser
6. Tatiana Ryba
7. F. Gardner
8. Kristoffer Henriksen

Citations in the corpus

• International society of sport psychology position stand: Athletes’ mental health, performance, and development (2017, methodology): “…mood changes and affective states exhibited a dose–response relationship, the efficient self-reported measures of mood, such as the POMS and BRUMS, can be used to monitor athletes’ training loads, especially under intensive or prolonged physical training (Main & Grove, 2009; Raglin & Wilson, 2000).”