Public discourse and decision making: Exploring possibilities for financial, social and environmental accounting

By G. Boyce. 2000

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d0976cb4b13e7dde95e5e19576c5b56b5dd01e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. M. Marcuccio
2. Judy Brown
3. J. Mack
4. Bob Frame
5. C. Ryan
6. I. Steccolini

In Public Administration

1. M. Marcuccio
2. Judy Brown
3. J. Mack
4. Bob Frame
5. C. Ryan
6. I. Steccolini

Citations in the corpus

• Reflections on the theoretical underpinnings of the general‐purpose financial reports of Australian government departments (2006, background): “Others have argued that the information provided and reported by accounting systems can create its own reality (Hopwood, 1984; Wilmott, 1985; Hines, 1988; Guthrie, 1998; Boyce, 2000).”
• Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability (2008, background): “Boyce (2000) addresses the issue of accounting as a social technology – "a form of social power" (p. 27) that may perform an enabling or constraining function.”
• Social and environmental reporting in local authorities (2005, background): “…healthcare sector), while others investigate the interplay between external reporting and internal management practices (Frost and Seamer 2002; Ball 2003) or propose improvements in SER practices (Burritt and Welch 1997; Bowerman and Hutchinson 1998; Bebbington et al. 1999; Boyce 2000; Ball 2004).”