Design for value change

By I. van de Poel. 2018

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In the value sensitive design (VSD) literature, there has been little attention for how values may change during the adoption and use of a sociotechnical system, and what that implies for design. A value change taxonomy is proposed, as well as a number of technical features that allow dealing with value change.

Subfields: Mechanical Engineering, Sociology and Political Science, AI Ethics, Fairness & Society, Human-Computer Interaction, Philosophy

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Verena Rieser
2. Gavin Abercrombie
3. Dirk Hovy
4. A. S. Bergman
5. Emily Dinan
6. Shannon L. Spruit
7. Y-Lan Boureau

In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society

1. Shannon L. Spruit
2. Gavin Abercrombie
3. Verena Rieser
4. Emily Dinan
5. Y-Lan Boureau
6. Zeerak Talat
7. Svetlana Kiritchenko
8. Michael Wiegand

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Verena Rieser
2. Gavin Abercrombie
3. Dirk Hovy
4. A. S. Bergman
5. Emily Dinan
6. Shannon L. Spruit
7. Y-Lan Boureau

In Philosophy

1. Verena Rieser
2. Y-Lan Boureau

Citations in the corpus

• Anticipating Safety Issues in E2E Conversational AI: Framework and Tooling (2021, background): “As discussed in §3.4, van de Poel (2018) advocates for designing systems with a focus on adaptability, robustness, and flexibility.”
• Guiding the Release of Safer E2E Conversational AI through Value Sensitive Design (2022, background): “As advocated in van de Poel (2018), systems should be designed with a focus on adaptability, robustness, and flexibility.”