Electromagnetic Simulation Using the FDTD Method

By D. Sullivan. 2000

1,251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ceb9d25073124c0e2ea8a113eb9a56791fe80af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Meep: A flexible free-software package for electromagnetic simulations by the FDTD method (2010, methodology): “In keeping with the Unix philosophy, Meep is not a plotting program; instead, it outputs ﬁelds and related data to the standard HDF5 format for scientiﬁc datasets [67], which can be read by many other programs and visualized in various ways.”
Exponential Improvement in Photon Storage Fidelities Using Subradiance and “Selective Radiance” in Atomic Arrays (2017, background): “Furthermore, while the Green’s function can be calculated numerically [81], to do so with sufficient accuracy appears quite challenging (in particular, it must be calculated with enough accuracy so that diagonalization correctly captures subradiant emission rates that scale like large inverse powers”
Quantum matter built from nanoscopic lattices of atoms and photons (2018, background): “Specifically, FDTD (Rodriguez et al., 2009; McCauley et al., 2010) and boundary element (Reid et al., 2009) methods have been implemented to compute atom-nanostructure surface interactions (Hung et al., 2013).”
Plasmonic and metamaterial structures as electromagnetic absorbers (2014, methodology): “Nowadays, numerical methods including the finite-element method (FEM) [68], finite-difference timedomain method (FDTD) [69], finite-integration technique (FIT) [70], and rigorous coupled-wave analysis method (RCWA) [71] have become powerful enough to quantify the electromagnetic response from arbitr”