Utility in Social Choice

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Unified Framework for Max-Min and Min-Max Fairness With Applications (2007, background): “A leximin social welfare ordering is a refinement of the maximin social welfare function [4], [5].”
Poverty and time (2012, methodology): “In particular, poverty has to employ translation-scale comparable values; see, for instance, Blackorby et al. [6] and Bossert and Weymark [ 8 ] for a discussion.”
Multidimensional generalized Gini indices (2005, methodology): “Hence, by Theorem 8.1 in Bossert and Weymark (2004), V must be a continuous increasing transform of a function of the form given in (19).”
Meaningful environmental indices: a social choice approach (2004, background): “e.g. [ 3 ]), but are in general of less relevance for the problems”
Utilitarianism and the Theory of Justice (2002, methodology): “12 This approach was developed in contributions such as d’Aspremont and Gevers (1977), Roberts (1980a,b) and Sen (1974). See Basu (1983), Bossert (1991, 1999), Bossert and Stehling (1992, 1994), Falmagne (1981), Fishburn, Marcus-Roberts and Roberts (1988), Fishburn and Roberts (1989) and Krantz, Luc”