Unexplained Gaps and Oaxaca-Blinder Decompositions

By Todd E. Elder, J. Goddeeris, Steven J. Haider. Social Science Research Network, 2009

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We analyze four methods to measure unexplained gaps in mean outcomes: three decompositions based on the seminal work of Oaxaca (1973) and Blinder (1973) and an approach involving a seemingly naive regression that includes a group indicator variable. Our analysis yields two principal findings. We show that the coefficient on a group indicator variable from an OLS regression is an attractive approach for obtaining a single measure of the unexplained gap. We also show that a commonly-used pooling decomposition systematically overstates the contribution of observable characteristics to mean outcome differences when compared to OLS regression, therefore understating unexplained differences. We then provide three empirical examples that explore the practical importance of our analytic results.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ce533f322cd25e230fb2c673fa6a49fcdc2139a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. D. Cobb-Clark
  2. Tymon Słoczyński

Citations in the corpus