Utility of the Brief Symptom Inventory in the Assessment of Psychological Distress

By S. Kellett, N. Beail, D. Newman, P. Frankish. 2003

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7cdaac1275886106fbd8e63e9c12eb6d3cb8fa81

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. M. Delisi
2. M. Vaughn
3. C. Haney
4. Michael T. Baglivio
5. Kevin T. Wolff
6. Alex R. Piquero
7. Nathan Epps

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. M. Delisi
2. M. Vaughn

Citations in the corpus

• Were Wolfgang's chronic offenders psychopaths? On the convergent validity between psychopathy and career criminality (2008, result): “Prior studies supported the BSI as a reliable and valid measure of current psychiatric symptoms (Derogatis & Savitz, 2000; Kellett, Beail, Newman, & Frankish, 2003; Soar, Turner, & Parrott, 2006).”
• The Psychological Effects of Solitary Confinement: A Systematic Critique (2018, background): “One study that the authors cited to support its psychometric properties (Kellett et al. 2003) concerned the BSI’s reliability with persons suffering from intellectual disabilities and did not include a representative sample of prisoners (the “forensic” portion of the sample consisted of 45…”