Pan trap catches of pollinator insects vary with habitat

By Manu E. Saunders, Gary W. Luck. 2013

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7cc651e7937973814483b4949228dcfe446178cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Kingsley W. Dixon
2. N. Joshi
3. Philip W. Bateman
4. Myles H. M. Menz
5. K. Prendergast

In Insect Science

1. Kingsley W. Dixon
2. N. Joshi
3. Philip W. Bateman
4. D. Biddinger
5. Myles H. M. Menz
6. K. Prendergast

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Kingsley W. Dixon
2. Philip W. Bateman

Citations in the corpus

• The relative performance of sampling methods for native bees: an empirical test and review of the literature (2020, background): “As with Saunders and Luck (2013), we found evidence that relative attractiveness of pan trap colors varies according to habitat type.”
• Comparative Trapping Efficiency to Characterize Bee Abundance, Diversity, and Community Composition in Apple Orchards (2015, background): “…region can influence findings about the relative abundance of bees in that region (Leong and Thorp 1999, Cane et al. 2000, Baum and Wallen 2011, Saunders and Luck 2013); due to color-specific characteristics, the pan traps might attract only bee species attracted to those colors (Leong and…”