Performances of prognostic scoring systems in patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia.

By Byeong-Ho Jeong, W. Koh, H. Yoo, S. Um, Y. Gee, Man Pyo Suh, H. Chung, Kim, J. Kwon, K. Jeon. 2013

53 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Epidemiology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Lieven Billiet
2. S. Van Huffel
3. Vanya Van Belle
4. Berk Ustun
5. Cynthia Rudin
6. Ivan Markovsky

Citations in the corpus

• Interval Coded Scoring: a toolbox for interpretable scoring systems (2018, background): “…scoring systems include Alvarado for appendicitis (Alvarado, 1986), CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc for atrial fibrillation (Lip et al., 2010), Glasgow for pancreatitis (Mounzer et al., 2012), CURB-65 for pneumonia (Jeong et al., 2013) and ASDAS for disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis (Lukas et al., 2009).”
• Interval Coded Scoring extensions for larger problems (2017, background): “Examples of such approaches include CHA2DS2-VASc for atrial fibrillation [3], Glasgow for pancreatitis [4] and CURB-65 for pneumonia [5].”