The solution of nonlinear finite element equations
By Hermann G. Matthies, G. Strang. 1979
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Richard H. Byrd
- Yinjun Wu
- Jorge Nocedal
- Edgar Dobriban
- Susan B. Davidson
- L. Lowes
- Bobby Schnabel
- Andreas Keese
Citations in the corpus
- DeltaGrad: Rapid retraining of machine learning models (2020, methodology): “We leverage the L-BFGS algorithm to approximate this, see e.g. Matthies & Strang (1979); Nocedal (1980); Byrd et al. (1994; 1995); Zhu et al. (1997); No-cedal & Wright (2006); Mokhtari & Ribeiro (2015) and references therein.”
- A Beam-Column Joint Model for Simulating the Earthquake Response of Reinforced Concrete Frames (2004, methodology): “Modification of the classical Newton-Raphson solution algorithm to include a linesearch [Matthies and Strang 1979] 2.”
- Numerical Methods and Smolyak Quadrature for Nonlinear Stochastic Partial Differential Equations (2003, unknown): “[33].”
- Galerkin methods for linear and nonlinear elliptic stochastic partial differential equations (2005, methodology): “The Quasi-Newton methods produce updates to the inverse of a matrix, and these low-rank changes [15] are also best kept in tensor product form [44]; so that we have tensor products here on two levels, which makes for a very economical representation.”
- Updating Quasi-Newton Matrices With Limited Storage (1980, unknown): “It is essentially the same as the formula for the usual BFGS [6].”
- Representations of quasi-Newton matrices and their use in limited memory methods (1994, methodology): “It is given in Nocedal (1980) and is based on the recursion developed by Matthies and Strang (1979) for the standard BFGS method.”
- FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics. (2012, unknown): “FEBio uses the BFGS method [23], which is one of the more effective quasiNewton methods for computational solid mechanics.”