Reading and auditory-visual equivalences.

By M. Sidman. 1971

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

On the Binding Problem in Artificial Neural Networks (2020, background): “RFT was originally conceived to explain “stimulus equivalence” (Sidman, 1971): The emergent behavior to respond to events and objects through a derived “sameness” relation that has not been explicitly taught or reinforced.”
A Relational Frame Training Intervention to Raise Intelligence Quotients: A Pilot Study (2011, background): “As Sidman (2008) noted, however, his approach to stimulus equivalence is “a limited theory in that it does not”
Relational Frame Theory: Some Implications for Understanding and Treating Human Psychopathology (2004, unknown): “Relational networks appear to overlap considerably with many natural language phenomena, such as naming and reading (e.g., deRose, deSouza, Rossito & deRose, 1992; Sidman, 1971).”
Concept learning in animals. (2008, background): “An extensive program of research on formal stimulus equivalence began with a now classic experiment by Sidman (1971).”
Relational Frame Theory and Stimulus Equivalence: Conceptual and Procedural Issues (2004, background): “In experimental settings, the stimuli used as samples and comparisons are often visual forms, but they may also involve auditory (e.g., Sidman, 1971), olfactory (e.g., Annett & Leslie, © Intern.”
Training and Testing Parameters in Formation of Stimulus Equivalence: Methodological Issues (2012, background): “123EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS 2012, 13, 123–135 123 NUMBER 1 (SUMMER 2012) Since Sidman’s first article on stimulus equivalence early in the seventies (Sidman, 1971), interest in stimulus equivalence among researchers has been substantial.”