A new view of statistics

By W. Hopkins. 2002

785 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c7a26d14151d0f19c1c1bf628c9a4a5d3ef9a65

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists (2007, unknown): “If normalising transformation fails, a drastic solution may be to calculate effect size using rank-transformed values (Hopkins, 2004).”
Reporting and Interpreting Effect Size in Quantitative Agricultural Education Research. (2011, background): “Adapted with permission. aSeveral authors have published guidelines for interpreting the magnitude of correlation coefficients. bNote the more stringent nature of these descriptors when compared to Davis (1971) and Hopkins (1997).”
Reliability of Power in Physical Performance Tests (2001, methodology): “The methods we have used to assess reliability are described in recent reviews.[1-3] Briefly, our main measure of reliability is the typical percent error: the standard error of measurement expressed 212 Hopkins et al.”
Empirical Analysis of Object-Oriented Design Metrics for Predicting High and Low Severity Faults (2006, background): “Assuming a reasonably sized data set, Hopkins calls a correlation value less than 0.1 trivial, 0.1–0.3 minor, 0.3–0.5 moderate, 0.5–0.7 large, 0.7–0.9 very large, and 0.9–1.0 almost perfect [19].”
Ecological Restoration Treatments Increase Butterfly Richness and Abundance: Mechanisms of Response (2004, methodology): “Changes in butterfly richness and abundance were analyzed for a significant treatment–year interaction with a repeated measures ANOVA (n5 4 blocks) using repeated contrasts to test for differences between treatment units among years (Hopkins 2000).”
Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science (2000, background): “nitudes of the retest correlation for practical use, although they did cite my statistics website[11] for the relationship between retest correlation and sample size in experimental studies (see section 2.”