The complete (3‐D) surface displacement field in the epicentral area of the 1999 MW7.1 Hector Mine Earthquake, California, from space geodetic observations

By Y. Fialko, Mark Simons, Duncan Carr Agnew. 2001

554 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Geophysics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c75f2b07209c95a5ab720f97d24d5325d38df6f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. Michele Crosetto
2. Bruno Crippa
3. María Cuevas-González
4. Núria Devanthéry
5. Oriol Monserrat
6. David T. Sandwell
7. N. Bechor
8. Howard Allan Zebker

In Geophysics

1. N. Bechor
2. Howard Allan Zebker
3. David T. Sandwell
4. Kazuo Ouchi

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. N. Bechor
2. María Cuevas-González
3. Oriol Monserrat
4. Howard Allan Zebker
5. Núria Devanthéry
6. Bruno Crippa
7. Michele Crosetto

Citations in the corpus

• The 2010 Maule, Chile earthquake: Downdip rupture limit revealed by space geodesy (2010, background): “[6] As interferograms are only able to detect relative movement, GPS vectors are important for providing absolute measurements of displacement and constraining the overall magnitude of slip [Fialko et al., 2001].”
• Measuring two‐dimensional movements using a single InSAR pair (2006, methodology): “(a, b) MAI and pixel-offset [Fialko et al., 2001] displacements for the Hector Mine earthquake.”
• Persistent Scatterer Interferometry: A review (2016, background): “Its main limitation is the low sensitivity to deformation, which is a fraction of the SAR pixel footprint (e.g. 1/10th or 1/20th of the pixel, see Fialko et al. (2001) and Strozzi et al. (2002)) and depends on the local SAR amplitude contrast.”