Comparison of prognostic algorithms for estimating remaining useful life of batteries
By Bhaskar Saha, Kai Goebel, Jon Christophersen. 2009
432 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c73266ff900ed9a63b72a0cfc26e12b28cc6167
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
In Biomedical Engineering
In Control and Systems Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery with unscented particle filter technique (2013, methodology): “Saha presented a comparative study of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), extended Kalman filtering, relevance vector machine (RVM), support vector machine (SVM) and PF approaches on experimental data collected from lithium-ion batteries in the remaining useful life prediction [19].”
- Practical options for selecting data-driven or physics-based prognostics algorithms with reviews (2015, background): “On the other hand, a relatively small number of reviews on prognostics are available [13–17].”
- Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches (2011, background): “for RUL estimation, see Saha et al. (2009). All of the above filteringbased models have one drawback in common in that they need a”
- Multiobjective Deep Belief Networks Ensemble for Remaining Useful Life Estimation in Prognostics (2017, methodology): “Implementation of traditional data-driven methods [4], [6]–[12], such as neural networks (NNs) [7] [83], support vector machines (SVMs) [6], local Gaussian regres-”
- Remaining Useful Life Prediction for Lithium-Ion Battery: A Deep Learning Approach (2018, methodology): “we adopt the lithium-ion battery batteries data set from NASA AMES Center [38], [39].”
- A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Algorithms for Smart Manufacturing: Tool Wear Prediction Using Random Forests (2017, methodology): “For example, model-based prognostics include methods based on Wiener and Gamma processes [13], hidden Markov models (HMMs) [14], Kalman filters [15,16], and particle filters [17–20].”
- Stochastic modelling and analysis of degradation for highly reliable products (2015, methodology): “Variants of the Kalman filter, such as the extended Kalman filter [101] and the unscented Kalman filter, should be used.”