Artificial intelligence for education: Knowledge and its assessment in AI-enabled learning ecologies
By Bill Cope, Mary Kalantzis, Duane Searsmith. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2020
433 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Over the past ten years, we have worked in a collaboration between educators and computer scientists at the University of Illinois to imagine futures for education in the context of what is loosely called “artificial intelligence.” Unhappy with the first generation of digital learning environments, our agenda has been to design alternatives and research their implementation. Our starting point has been to ask, what is the nature of machine intelligence, and what are its limits and potentials in education? This paper offers some tentative answers, first conceptually, and then practically in an overview of the results of a number of experimental implementations documented in greater detail elsewhere. Our key finding is that artificial intelligence—in the context of the practices of electronic computing developing over the past three quarters of a century—will never in any sense “take over” the role of teacher, because how it works and what it does are so profoundly different from human intelligence. However, within the limits that we describe in this paper, it offers the potential to transform education in ways that—counterintuitively perhaps—make education more human, not less.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c663204f4b1f5c0a112bce0d84b21e1c1b7f798
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Víctor González-Calatayud
- Paz Prendes-Espinosa
- Rosabel Roig-Vila
Citations in the corpus
- The AI Revolution in Education: Will AI Replace or Assist Teachers in Higher Education? (2023, neutral): “…AI’s capabilities, scholars only view AI as “cognitive prostheses” that can aid teaching and learning, but not yet capable of replacing the values of human thoughts or collaborative relationships between teachers and students (Cope, Kalantzis & Searsmith, 2021; Felix, 2020; Kim, Lee & Cho, 2022).”
- Artificial Intelligence for Student Assessment: A Systematic Review (2021, background): “The comparison between human and artificial intelligence is really interesting [7,8].”