Pest Management in Food Systems: An Economic Perspective
By Gina Waterfield, David Zilberman. 2012
134 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c565be807ad13b36af9b2ab86e96b4f39ccf2ce
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Comparative Economics of Conventional, Organic, and Alternative Agricultural Production Systems (2021, background): “Socioeconomic Contributors to the Regulation of Pest Management Waterfield and Zilberman (2012) outline some of the externalities of pest management, including environmental effects, public/occupational health, and even productivity effects on neighboring farms.”
- Natural Product-Based Biopesticides for Insect Control (2010, background): “The use of SPs allowed for increased crop yields but it has also generated environmental and health problems along with increased pest resistance and loss of biodiversity.(618)”
- Incentives and policies for integrated pest management in Europe: a review (2014, unknown): “Information measures important for IPM adoption include free or subsidized pest management advisors, independent from, and complementary to, the advice provided by companies or commercial entities selling plant protection products (Waterfield and Zilberman 2012).”
- Nudging farmers to enrol land into agri-environmental schemes: the role of a collective bonus (2016, background): “This could clearly contribute to reduce the unit costs of abatement (Waterfield and Zilberman, 2012).”