A right to be forgotten?
By L. Bygrave. Communications of the ACM, 2014
399 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c54f8b7becce8d551ec4e458c9312ce786fbe48
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- The Debate on the Moral Responsibilities of Online Service Providers (2015, background): “27 According to the European approach, privacy trumps freedom of speech; whereas the American view is that freedom of speech is preeminent with respect to privacy (Rosen 2012).”
- Privacy.tag: privacy concern expressed and respected (2014, background): “We emphasize up front that PERP is also a privacy protection/enforcement solution.”
- Five Years of the Right to be Forgotten (2019, background): “In July 2015, Russia passed a law that allows citizens to delist links from Russian search engines that “violates Russian laws or if the information is false or has become obsolete” [26].”
- Model Aggregation via Good-Enough Model Spaces (2018, background): “• Privacy and data ephemerality : Privacy policies or regulations like GDPR may require nodes to periodically delete the raw local data [10].”