Comparison of single and binary oxide MoO3, TiO2 and WO3 sol–gel gas sensors

By K. Galatsis, Yongxiang Li, Wojtek Wlodarski, Elisabetta Comini, Giorgio Sberveglieri, C. Cantalini, S. Santucci, M. Passacantando. 2002

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Bioengineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Polymers and Plastics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c456490b553ceda1ff2efee04eede71f208d8fe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Bioengineering

1. G. Eranna

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Zoran Stamenkovic
2. Vladimir M. Milovanović
3. Zorka Z. Vasiljevic
4. Maria Vesna Nikolic
5. G. Eranna

Citations in the corpus

• Oxide Materials for Development of Integrated Gas Sensors—A Comprehensive Review (2004, background): “99 Although these two disadvantages have been identified, MoO 3 possesses good gas response because it has been used in the field of catalysis for oxidation reactions of hydrocarbons.”
• Semiconductor Gas Sensors: Materials, Technology, Design, and Application (2020, background): “An overview of the investigated metal oxide semiconductors shows that over the years, n-type semiconducting oxides [18] like tin oxide (SnO2) [36,37], zinc oxide (ZnO) [38,39], anatase (TiO2) [40,41], hematite (α-Fe2O3) [11], and tungsten oxide (WO3) [42,43] and, to a lesser degree, p-type semicondu”