The political economy of climate adaptation

By Benjamin Sovacool, Björn‐Ola Linnér, M. Goodsite. 2015

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Initiatives to adapt to the effects of climate change are growing in number but may fail to achieve the desired outcomes unless critical competing interests are taken into account during the planning process.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c43bbe0acb07ed4467b665c9b7a9f3e5af4f5cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. H. Wlokas
2. Chaitanya Kumar Kotikalapudi
3. Matthew J. Burke
4. Lucy Baker
5. Benjamin Sovacool
6. Francesco Vona

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Benjamin Sovacool
2. Matthew J. Burke
3. Lucy Baker
4. Francesco Vona

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Benjamin Sovacool
2. Lucy Baker
3. Matthew J. Burke
4. Francesco Vona

Citations in the corpus

• Job losses and political acceptability of climate policies: why the ‘job-killing’ argument is so persistent and how to overturn it (2018, background): “Other interesting cases studies of distributional impacts and their political consequences are in Sovacool, Linnér, and Goodsite (2015).”
• New frontiers and conceptual frameworks for energy justice (2017, background): “Sovacool et al. (2015) similarly found that many interventions framed as “pro-climate change adaptation” or “pro- development” in fact served to transfer public assets into private hands, limit access to resources or marginalize particular stakeholders in decision-making activities, intrude on…”