The effect of reward duration on demand functions for rest in dairy heifers and lying requirements as measured by demand functions
By M. B. Jensen, Lene Juul Pedersen, L. Munksgaard. 2005
213 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c1d096abc840c053e6dcd4bda5ab2da86f14181
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Animal Science and Zoology
In Small Animals
Citations in the corpus
- Using preference, motivation and aversion tests to ask scientific questions about animals’ feelings (2006, methodology): “When reward size is controlled, different reward sizes can produce different demand curves (Jensen et al., 2004b,c), even for resources such as food (Hursh et al., 1988) where a small reward size does not interfere with consummation.”
- Resting pattern and social interactions in goats—The impact of size and organisation of lying space (2007, background): “According to Jensen et al. (2005), heifers show an inelastic demand to rest for at least 50% of a 24-”
- Invited review: Effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare. (2017, background): “Several studies examining the lying time of cows in freestalls report a range of 11 to 14 h (Cook et al., 2004a; Jensen et al., 2005; Ito et al., 2010) under thermo-neutral conditions, with a 30% reduction when ambient temperatures increase (Cook et al., 2007).”