Peer-to-peer energy sharing through a two-stage aggregated battery control in a community Microgrid

By C. Long, Jianzhong Wu, Yue Zhou, Nicholas Jenkins. Applied Energy, 2018

450 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Peer-to-peer (P2P) energy sharing allows the surplus energy from distributed energy resources (DERs) to trade between prosumers in a community Microgrid. P2P energy sharing is being becoming more attractive than the conventional peer-to-grid (P2G) trading. However, intensive sensing and communication infrastructures are required either for information flows in a local market or for building a central control system. Moreover, the existing pricing mechanisms for P2P energy sharing could not ensure all the P2P participants gain economic benefits. This work proposed a two-stage aggregated control to realize P2P energy sharing in community Microgrids, where only the measurement at the point of common coupling (PCC) and one-way communication are required. This method allows individual prosumers to control their DERs via a third party entity, so called energy sharing coordinator (ESC). In the first stage, a constrained non-linear programming (CNLP) optimization with a rolling horizon was used to minimize the energy costs of the community. In the second stage, a rule based control was carried out updating the control set-points according to the real-time measurement. The benefits of P2P energy sharing were assessed from the community’s as well as individual customers’ perspective. The proposed method was applied to residential community Microgrids with photovoltaic (PV) battery systems. It was revealed that P2P energy sharing is able to reduce the energy cost of the community by 30% compared to the conventional P2G energy trading. The modified supply demand ratio based pricing mechanism ensures every individual customer be better off, and can be used as a benchmark for any P2P energy sharing model. For consumers, the electricity bill is reduced by ∼12.4%, and for prosumers, the annual income is increased by ∼£57 per premises.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c1656084adf389319c6affb590abc046dbe89b7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

  1. Qiuwei Wu
  2. H. Jia
  3. Xiaolong Jin
  4. Chau Yuen
  5. Wayes Tushar
  6. Tapan Kumar Saha
  7. H. Vincent Poor
  8. David B. Smith

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Chau Yuen
  2. H. Vincent Poor
  3. Wayes Tushar
  4. H. Jia
  5. Xiaolong Jin
  6. Tapan Kumar Saha
  7. Qiuwei Wu
  8. David B. Smith

Citations in the corpus