Domestic Inequality and Carbon Emissions in Comparative Perspective

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Income Inequality and Carbon Emissions in the United States: A State-level Analysis, 1997–2012 (2017, background): “…question has been addressed, most of the studies have taken their unit of analysis as the nation state, asking how domestic measures of income inequality affect CO2 emissions across countries and over time (Ravallion et al., 2000; Grunewald et al., 2012; Jorgenson, 2015; Jorgenson et al., 2016).”
Wealth Inequality and Carbon Emissions in High-income Countries (2017, methodology): “Therefore, it is somewhat surprising that connections between domestic economic inequality and carbon emissions have largely been overlooked until recently (Jorgenson et al. 2015; Jorgenson et al. 2016; Jorgenson et al. 2017).”
The Green New Deal in the United States: What it is and how to pay for it (2020, unknown): “The higher the Gini coe ﬃ cient of both wealth and income, the higher the CO2 emissions per inhabitant [68,69,70].”
The role of education in the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Evidence from Australian data (2018, result): “While some of them obtain that redistributing income would have a beneficial effect (e.g., Golley and Meng, 2012; Baek and Gweisah, 2013), others find opposite or heterogeneous results in according different macroeconomic contexts (e.g., Brännlund and Ghalwash, 2008; Jorgenson et al., 2016).”