Climate Sensitivity via a Nonparametric Fluctuation–Dissipation Theorem
By Fenwick C. Cooper, Peter H. Haynes. 2011
68 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7bf93e77e78c3112594f80e597f09ed129496e1d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Global and Planetary Change
- L. Zanna
- Valerio Lucarini
- PierGianLuca Porta-Mana
- Luke Metz
- Tal Kachman
- Sam Schoenholz
- C. Freeman
- S. Pascale
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Valerio Lucarini
- L. Zanna
- Luke Metz
- Tal Kachman
- Sam Schoenholz
- C. Freeman
- S. Pascale
- Corentin Herbert
Citations in the corpus
- Mathematical and physical ideas for climate science (2013, background): “…response to perturbation depends critically on the choice of the observable of interest, on the length of the integrations needed for constructing the approximation of the invariant measure, and, of course, on the validity of the linear approximation (Cooper and Haynes, 2011; Cooper et al., 2013).”
- Gradients are Not All You Need (2021, methodology): “Other methods make use of the Fluctuation-Dissipation Theorem with various diferent assumptions [Abramov and Majda, 2007, Cooper and Haynes, 2011].”
- Toward a stochastic parameterization of ocean mesoscale eddies (2014, background): “However, the use of Gaussian distributions as forcing of non-Gaussian systems has been shown to lead to quantitative discrepancies in the system’s response (Franzke et al., 2007; Ring and Plumb, 2008; Cooper and Haynes, 2011).”