The influence of scan mode and circle fitting on tree stem detection, stem diameter and volume extraction from terrestrial laser scans

By P. Pueschel, G. Newnham, Gilles Rock, T. Udelhoven, Willy Werner, Joachim Hill. 2013

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Geology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7bf8f3caea06ec25103c74e0388d86d138ec23a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

1. Kim Calders
2. Mathias I. Disney
3. Jan Hackenberg
4. Martin Herold
5. Pasi Raumonen
6. Heinrich Spiecker

In Geology

1. Jan Hackenberg
2. Mathias I. Disney
3. Pasi Raumonen
4. Heinrich Spiecker
5. Kim Calders
6. Yadvinder S. Malhi

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Mathias I. Disney
2. Martin Herold
3. Yadvinder S. Malhi

Citations in the corpus

• SimpleTree —An Efficient Open Source Tool to Build Tree Models from TLS Clouds (2015, methodology): “, using multiple scan locations versus scanning from a single location, can have a large impact on the accuracy of the retrieved forestry parameters [14,19,20].”
• Quantifying branch architecture of tropical trees using terrestrial LiDAR and 3D modelling (2018, background): “Moreover, previous studies using TLS have mostly focused on temperate trees in their leafless condition and with a comparatively low canopy height (Burt et al. 2013; Dassot et al. 2010; Hackenberg et al. 2014; Holopainen et al. 2011; Kaasalainen et al. 2014; Krooks et al. 2014; Pueschel et al. 2013;”