Natural Disasters and the Effect of Trade on Income: A New Panel IV Approach
By Gabriel Felbermayr, J. Gröschl. Social Science Research Network, 2011
111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Does trade openness cause higher GDP per capita? Since the seminal instrumental variables (IV) estimates of Frankel and Romer [F&R](1999) important doubts have surfaced. Is the correlation spurious and driven by omitted geographical and institutional variables? In this paper, we generalize F&R’s geography-based empirical strategy to a panel setting. We observe that natural disasters affect bilateral trade, and that this effect is conditioned by geographical variables such as distance to financial centers or area. This allows us to use interactions between geography and the incidence of disasters at the bilateral level to construct an instrument for multilateral openness that varies across countries and time. The instrument can be used in panel setups where it is possible to fully control for geographical and historical determinants of countries’ performances as well as for the direct effect of disasters. We find that the elasticity of income with respect to openness is about 0.69, but that substantial heterogeneity exists across country samples.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7bf8dec953f017708fae226cb57905f65bab8531
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Sociology and Political Science
In Soil Science
Citations in the corpus
- Naturally Negative: The Growth Effects of Natural Disasters (2014, unknown): “Felbermayr and Gröschl (2013), EER GDP level outcomes world countries Depending on the sample, neutral, positive or negative effects.”
- Natural disasters' impact, factors of resilience and development: A meta-analysis of the macroeconomic literature (2014, background): “In our sample 31 studies investigate direct costs, 28 analyze indirect costs and 5 studies (Anttila-Hughes and Hsiang, 2013; Deryugina, 2013; Felbermayr and Gröschl, 2013a; Jackson, 2013; Zylberberg, 2012) consider both cost categories.”