Chemistry as a probe of the structures and evolution of massive star-forming regions

By S. Doty, E. V. van Dishoeck, F. V. D. van der Tak, A. Boonman. 2002

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present detailed thermal and gas-phase chemical models for the envelope of the massive star-forming region AFGL 2591. By considering both time- and space-dependent chemistry, these models are used to study both the physical structure proposed by van der Tak et al. (1999, 2000), as well as the chemical evolution of this region. The model predictions are compared with observed abundances and column densities for 29 species. The observational data cover a wide range of physical conditions within the source, but signicantly probe the inner regions where interesting high-temperature chemistry may be occurring. Taking appropriate care when comparing models with both emission and absorption measurements, we nd that the majority of the chemical structure can be well-explained. In particular, we nd that the nitrogen and hydrocarbon chemistry can be signicantly aected by temperature, with the possibility of high-temperature pathways to HCN. While we cannot determine the sulphur reservoir, the observations can be explained by models with the majority of the sulphur in CS in the cold gas, SO2 in the warm gas, and atomic sulphur in the warmest gas. Because the model overpredicts CO2 by a factor of 40, various high-temperature destruction mechanisms are explored, including impulsive heating events. The observed abundances of ions such as HCO + and N2H + and the cold gas-phase production of HCN constrain the cosmic-ray ionization rate to5:6 10 17 s 1 , to within a factor of three. Finally, we nd that the model and observations can simultaneously agree at a reasonable level and often to within a factor of three for 7 10 3 t(yrs) 5 10 4 , with a strong preference for t 3 10 4 yrs since the collapse and formation of the

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7be76f87ce7d4b362204845c6425ea66d3b17c92

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Ralf Klessen
  2. C. McKee
  3. Jonathan C. Tan
  4. Mark R. Krumholz
  5. E. Dishoeck
  6. Christoph Federrath
  7. S. Glover
  8. J. Jørgensen

In Instrumentation

  1. Jonathan C. Tan
  2. Italy.
  3. F. Schoeier
  4. E. Dishoeck
  5. D. Galli
  6. L. Observatory
  7. Usa
  8. C. McKee

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Italy.
  2. F. Schoeier
  3. E. Dishoeck
  4. C. McKee
  5. U. Texas
  6. J. Jørgensen

Citations in the corpus