Utilising unprocessed low-lime coal fly ash in foamed concrete

By Martyn Jones, A. Mccarthy. 2005

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7be41cc6220562002ef73b3d1d1d0ae2b90e75f5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. Yunpeng Li
2. Lixin Wang
3. M. R. Jones
4. Xiuling Wang
5. Li Zheng
6. Yanbin Fu
7. Kezban Ozlutas

In Mechanical Engineering

1. M. R. Jones
2. Li Zheng
3. Kezban Ozlutas

Citations in the corpus

• Foam Concrete: A State-of-the-Art and State-of-the-Practice Review (2020, background): “Jones and McCarthy [138] compared adsorption differences between sand-based and fly ash-based FC. ,e results indicated that the fly ash-based mix was endowedwith higher water absorption than thatmixed with sand.”
• Stability and instability of foamed concrete (2016, methodology): “The methods used for designing, producing and curing the foamed concrete were as described by Jones and McCarthy (2005), except that a tolerance of ±25 kg/m3 of the target plastic density was used rather than the more typical ±50 kg/m3, as the latter could represent 25–50% of the target plastic…”