Lobbying activity and fora creation in the EU: empirically exploring the nature of the policy good

By A. Broscheid, D. Coen. 2007

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7bd42f30c6cbfecebd18d3f24dd29ee42d429025

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Å. Gornitzka
2. Ulf Sverdrup
3. D. Coen

In Strategy and Management

1. Å. Gornitzka
2. Ulf Sverdrup
3. D. Coen
4. J. Heijden

Citations in the corpus

• Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying (2007, background): “Looking at the demand and supply in tandem, the rise of forum politics and the emergence of a distinct European public policy style helps to explain a ‘bandwagon effect’ pulling yet more interest groups into Brussels ( Broscheid and Coen 2007; Hamada 2007).”
• Who consults? The configuration of expert groups in the European union (2008, background): “This kind of supply-side mechanism fits well with ideas of lobbying in the EU (Broscheid and Coen 2007; Coen 2007; Mahoney 2004) and with the observation made by Broscheid and Coen (2007) on an independent effect of the number of interest groups in a certain policy field and the establishment of con”
• Pressure and Expertise: Explaining the Information Supply of Interest Groups in EU Legislative Lobbying (2016, unknown): “As a result, information supply by interest groups has typically been viewed as part of an expertise-based exchange between policy-makers and interest groups (see for instance Bouwen, 2002; Broscheid and Coen, 2007).”