The nature of race : how scientists think and teach about human difference

By A. Morning. 2011

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites (2016, background): “Today, many laypeople, scientists, and scholars continue to believe that the black body is biologically and fundamentally different from the white body and that race is a fixed marker of group membership, rooted in biology (26 – 28).”
Why Status Matters for Inequality (2014, background): “…status bias and associational biases produce relatively unthinking biases in favor of the status privileged and against the less status privileged, defense of the status hierarchy results in more intentionally hostile actions to constrain lower status individuals who are perceived to “go too far.””
Race as a Bundle of Sticks: Designs that Estimate Effects of Seemingly Immutable Characteristics (2016, background): “Though explicit arguments for racial hierarchy have moved from the mainstream of society to the margins, racial essentialism continues to inform much of how both lay people and scientists understand group differences (Mendelberg 2001; Morning 2011).”
Racial Inequality in Psychological Research: Trends of the Past and Recommendations for the Future (2020, unknown): “Note that concepts of race vary across generations, disciplines, individuals, and contexts (Glasgow, 2009; Hobbs, 2014; Morning, 2011).”