Excursion and contour uncertainty regions for latent Gaussian models
By David Bolin, Finn Lindgren. 2012
138 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In several areas of application ranging from brain imaging to astrophysics and geostatistics, an important statistical problem is to find regions where the process studied exceeds a certain level. Estimating such regions so that the probability for exceeding the level in the entire set is equal to some predefined value is a difficult problem connected to the problem of multiple significance testing. In this work, a method for solving this problem, as well as the related problem of finding credible regions for contour curves, for latent Gaussian models is proposed. The method is based on using a parametric family for the excursion sets in combination with a sequential importance sampling method for estimating joint probabilities. The accuracy of the method is investigated by using simulated data and an environmental application is presented.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Engineering, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b819b2d9026fce7c3d77231ffc4c9504018a5a5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Andrea Riebler
- Daniel P. Simpson
- Finn Lindgren
- Håvard Rue
- H. Bakka
- Zdravko I. Botev
- Sigrunn Holbek Sørbye
- David Bolin
In Environmental Engineering
- Daniel P. Simpson
- Finn Lindgren
- Håvard Rue
- Andrea Riebler
- David Bolin
- Geir-Arne Fuglstad
- Zdravko I. Botev
- H. Bakka
In Statistics and Probability
- Andrea Riebler
- Daniel P. Simpson
- Finn Lindgren
- Håvard Rue
- Sigrunn Holbek Sørbye
- Zdravko I. Botev
- H. Bakka
- David Bolin
Citations in the corpus
- The normal law under linear restrictions: simulation and estimation via minimax tilting (2016, methodology): “…Davison, 2013; Genton et al., 2011); computation of simultaneous confidence bands (Aza¨ıs et al., 2010); uncertainty regions for latent Gaussian models (Bolin and Lindgren, 2015); fitting mixed e ff ects models with censored data (Gr¨un and Hornik, 2012); and probit regression (Albert and Chib,…”
- Geostatistical Modelling Using Non‐Gaussian Matérn Fields (2015, background): “Thus, the distributional assumptions are especially important if we are interested in predicting the probability for large amounts of precipitation or if we are interested in regions where the latent process exceeds a certain level, which is often important in applications (Bolin & Lindgren, 2015).”
- Spatial modelling with R-INLA: A review (2018, methodology): “It also simplifies the computation of excursion sets and uncertainty measures for contour maps, as shown by Bolin and Lindgren (2015) and Bolin and Lindgren (2017).”
- Bayesian Spatial Modelling with R-INLA (2015, unknown): “A non-parametric approach using similar GMRF models is available in the LatticeKrig package in CRAN (Nychka, Hammerling, Sain, and Lenssen 2013).”
- Bayesian Computing with INLA: A Review (2016, methodology): “, 2015), BAPC (Riebler and Held, 2016), diseasemapping and geostatp (Brown, 2015), and Bivand et al. (2015). Similarly, the excursions package for calculating joint exceedance probabilities in GMRFs (Bolin and Lindgren, 2015, 2016) includes an interface to analyse LGMs estimated by R-INLA. Recent wo”