RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks

By Jonathan W. Hui. Request for Comments, 2012

1,534 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b6b8b30a23725d2c55110d35d3bb93f690b7d91

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Convergence of MANET and WSN in IoT Urban Scenarios (2013, positive): “From this point of view, RPL and ZigBee are the most promising proposals: a stabilization of the respective standards and a wide support by industries would give a tremendous boost to widespread adoption of WSNs for IoT applications in smart cities.”
Smart Anomaly Detection in Sensor Systems (2020, positive): “Again, an interesting extension of RPL to mobility nodes (useful, for instance, within the automotive environment) is advanced in [118] where, by exploiting additional ﬁelds of RPL control packets, it is possible to advice a mobile sensor node for maintaining the energy by reducing network over-head”
Information centric networking in the IoT: experiments with NDN in the wild (2014, positive): “For instance, requirements for home, industrial and building automation [17] led to the design of the RPL [8] routing protocol, which can be more energy and memory efficient than standard link-state approaches.”
Security in Internet of Things: issues, challenges, taxonomy, and architecture (2017, positive): “This Routing Protocol for Low power and lossy network (RPL) addresses all the requirements and is considered as the basis for routing in this kind of networks [13].”
Anatomy of Threats to the Internet of Things (2019, neutral): “Network RPL (Routing Protocol for Low Power & Lossy Networks) Data Confidentiality, Data Authenticity & Integrity, Replay Protection, Semantic Security, Key Management [148]”
Security and Privacy in the Internet of Things (2017, neutral): “Various schemes have been proposed to secure IoT devices, which spans over a variety of topics including but not limited to authentication schemes [120, 105], light-weight communication protocols such as CoAP [131], RPL [152], and 6LoWPAN [130], secure operating system for IoT [25], and updating in-”
Evaluating Critical Security Issues of the IoT World: Present and Future Challenges (2018, neutral): “The RPL speciﬁcation [39] deﬁnes secure versions of the various routing control messages, as well as three basic security modes.”
Survey on Collaborative Smart Drones and Internet of Things for Improving Smartness of Smart Cities (2019, neutral): “Furthermore, the authors of [145] discussed how IPv6 routing could apply for secure drones and IoT collaboration for low power protocols [146].”
Security of the Internet of Things: Vulnerabilities, Attacks, and Countermeasures (2019, neutral): “For this kind of networks, a new network layer routing protocol is designed called RPL (Routing Protocol for Lowpower and lossy networks) [78].”
Structural Health Monitoring Framework Based on Internet of Things: A Survey (2017, positive): “Another protocol proposed is known as RPL, which is the acronym of routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks [18], [21].”
IoT: Internet of Threats? A Survey of Practical Security Vulnerabilities in Real IoT Devices (2019, positive): “Instead, the routing within the IoT network is usually based on the IPv6 routing protocol for lowpower and lossy networks (RPL), defined in RFC 6550 [90].”
Internet of Things (IoT): A Review of Its Enabling Technologies in Healthcare Applications, Standards Protocols, Security, and Market Opportunities (2021, neutral): “According to [4], the link-independent routing protocol based on IPv6 is a working organization normalized for resource-constrained nodes called RPL [28], which provides routing across low-power and lossy links (ROLLs) [29].”
Denial-of-Service detection in 6LoWPAN based Internet of Things (2013, neutral): “In future, by developing detection modules to detect attacks mentioned in [24] such as RPL-rank attack, the proposed detection architecture's results could be compared to [24].”
M2M Service Platforms: Survey, Issues, and Enabling Technologies (2014, neutral): “Another IETF working group, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks (ROLL), developed routing protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks (LLNs) [84], which is made up of many embedded devices with limited resources and interconnected by a variety of links, such as IEEE 802.”
Securing the Internet of Things: A Standardization Perspective (2014, neutral): “Years ago, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has standardized IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPAN) [29], Routing Over Low-power and Lossy networks (ROLL) [50], and Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) [49] to equip constrained devices with lowmemory footprint and”
A Survey on Internet of Things: Architecture, Enabling Technologies, Security and Privacy, and Applications (2017, positive): “Routing protocol for low power and lossy networks is a link-independent routing protocol, which can be deployed at resource-constrained nodes to determine routes over low power and lossy links [7], [128], [151].”