Methods of text and discourse analysis
By Stefan Titscher, Michael Meyer, R. Wodak, E. Vetter. 2000
1,256 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b485113958512ee29d52b343697f366683bd103
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Language and Linguistics
In Literature and Literary Theory
Citations in the corpus
- Content Analysis in an Era of Big Data: A Hybrid Approach to Computational and Manual Methods (2013, background): “…be objective and systematic—that is, that each step must consistently follow explicitly formulated rules and procedures—although there is less agreement over the need for content analyses to be quantitative and to only analyze manifest content (Holsti, 1969; Titscher, Meyer, Wodak, & Vetter, 2000).”
- Qualitative methods overview (2011, neutral): “One estimate has suggested that around two out of every three published qualitative papers claim to use grounded theory (Titscher et al. 2000, cited in Bryant and Charmaz 2010) even if the extent to which they can legitimately be described as having done so is more open to debate.”
- New Categories Are Not Enough (2015, methodology): “This study combines techniques from textual and discourse analysis with those from traditional content analysis (Mills 1997; Neuendorf 2002; Titscher et al. 2000).”