Fourier Descriptors, Procrustes Superimposition, and Data Dimensionality: An Example of Cranial Shape Analysis in Modern Human Populations

By M. Baylac, Martin Friess. 2005

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anthropology, Geometry and Topology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b330020b4ac45c9b90e5f2841561dca2c3c853d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anthropology

1. G. Larson
2. K. Dobney
3. A. Cardini
4. C. Klingenberg

In Geometry and Topology

1. G. Larson
2. C. Manzano
3. I. Miguel
4. Andone Estonba
5. M. Iriondo
6. L. Garnery
7. A. Evin
8. K. Dobney

Citations in the corpus

• The long and winding road: identifying pig domestication through molar size and shape (2013, methodology): “Another possibility involves extensively exploring sensitivity by including just one or a few PCs and then progressively increasing their number (Baylac and Friess, 2005).”
• Both geometric morphometric and microsatellite data consistently support the differentiation of the Apis mellifera M evolutionary branch (2011, methodology): “Due to the large number of variates and in order to maximize the power of the analyses, the dimension of the shape space was reduced using principal components, following the approach detailed in Baylac and Friess (2005) .”