Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency.

By Guoxing Zheng, H. Mühlenbernd, Mitchell Kenney, Guixin Li, T. Zentgraf, Shuang Zhang. Nature Nanotechnology, 2015

2,582 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Surfaces covered by ultrathin plasmonic structures--so-called metasurfaces--have recently been shown to be capable of completely controlling the phase of light, representing a new paradigm for the design of innovative optical elements such as ultrathin flat lenses, directional couplers for surface plasmon polaritons and wave plate vortex beam generation. Among the various types of metasurfaces, geometric metasurfaces, which consist of an array of plasmonic nanorods with spatially varying orientations, have shown superior phase control due to the geometric nature of their phase profile. Metasurfaces have recently been used to make computer-generated holograms, but the hologram efficiency remained too low at visible wavelengths for practical purposes. Here, we report the design and realization of a geometric metasurface hologram reaching diffraction efficiencies of 80% at 825 nm and a broad bandwidth between 630 nm and 1,050 nm. The 16-level-phase computer-generated hologram demonstrated here combines the advantages of a geometric metasurface for the superior control of the phase profile and of reflectarrays for achieving high polarization conversion efficiency. Specifically, the design of the hologram integrates a ground metal plane with a geometric metasurface that enhances the conversion efficiency between the two circular polarization states, leading to high diffraction efficiency without complicating the fabrication process. Because of these advantages, our strategy could be viable for various practical holographic applications.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3bc593827231a73581578fd33d50307be90e4e93

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

  1. Seyedeh Mahsa Kamali
  2. E. Arbabi
  3. A. Faraon
  4. Amir Arbabi
  5. N. Yu
  6. Shuang Zhang
  7. Sergey I. Bozhevolnyi
  8. Y. Horie

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Seyedeh Mahsa Kamali
  2. E. Arbabi
  3. Shuang Zhang
  4. A. Faraon
  5. Amir Arbabi
  6. N. Yu
  7. Houtong Chen
  8. A. Taylor

In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

  1. Seyedeh Mahsa Kamali
  2. E. Arbabi
  3. A. Faraon
  4. Amir Arbabi
  5. N. Yu
  6. Sergey I. Bozhevolnyi
  7. Houtong Chen
  8. Shuang Zhang

Citations in the corpus