Molecular and spatial analyses reveal links between colony-specific foraging distance and landscape-level resource availability in two bumblebee species
By C. Carvell, W. Jordan, A. Bourke, R. Pickles, J. Redhead, M. Heard. 2012
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b219df1132c5f6312599785f17c02008af6e7c6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Richard J. Gill
- J. Ollerton
- John M. Holland
- T. Breeze
- M. Garratt
- J. Osborne
- G. Woodward
- Mark J. F. Brown
In Genetics
In Insect Science
- Richard J. Gill
- J. Ollerton
- J. Osborne
- M. Garratt
- G. Woodward
- Mark J. F. Brown
- S. Potts
- John M. Holland
Citations in the corpus
- Grazing alters insect visitation networks and plant mating systems (2014, unknown): “As central location foragers, social bees can be sensitive to the distribution of nesting and forage habitats in the landscape surrounding the nest, although this depends on species identity and the extent of landscape simplification (Williams et al. 2010; Carvell et al. 2012; Kennedy et al. 2013).”
- Protecting an ecosystem service: approaches to understanding and mitigating threats to wild insect pollinators (2016, background): “948 Studies have shown that foraging abilities of flying insect pollinators range widely (Cant et 949 al., 2005; Carvell et al., 2012; Gathmann and Tscharntke, 2002; Greenleaf et al., 2007; 950 Knight et al., 2005; Osborne et al., 1999; Pasquet et al., 2008), and this will be further 951 44 | P a g…”