Mesa Grande: a methodological analysis of clinical trials of treatments for alcohol use disorders.

By W. Miller, P. Wilbourne. Addiction, 2002

792 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b2190b7879961ea904ffa8e629e2ff9ba933d40

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

1. J. M. Cronce
2. Mary E. Larimer
3. W. Miller
4. David J. Kavanagh
5. Jackie Andrade
6. Jon May

In Clinical Psychology

1. T. Moyers
2. R. K. Martins
3. D. McNeil
4. Mary E. Larimer
5. J. M. Cronce
6. W. Miller
7. David J. Kavanagh
8. Jackie Andrade

In Epidemiology

1. T. Moyers
2. J. M. Cronce
3. Mary E. Larimer
4. W. Miller
5. R. K. Martins
6. D. McNeil

Citations in the corpus

• Eight Stages in Learning Motivational Interviewing (2006, background): “…traditional (Valle, 1981) or behavioral treatment (Miller & Baca, 1983; Miller, Taylor, & West, 1980), whereas an authoritarian confrontive counseling approach is strongly linked to poorer treatment outcomes (Miller Benefield, & Tonigan, 1993; Miller & Wilbourne, 2002; Najavits & Weiss, 1994).”
• Review of Motivational Interviewing in promoting health behaviors. (2009, background): “Overall, MI has among the highest mean methodological quality in substance abuse treatment outcome research (Miller & Wilbourne, 2002).”
• How do people recover from alcohol dependence? A systematic review of the research on mechanisms of behavior change in Alcoholics Anonymous (2009, result): “The renewed emphasis on mechanisms of change stems from the consistent finding that, despite a burgeoning of empirically-supported treatments for alcohol and other drug use disorders (Finney et al. 1996; Miller and Willbourne 2002; SAMHSA 2008), these theoretically disparate interventions appear to ”
• Sensory Imagery in Craving: From Cognitive Psychology to New Treatments for Addiction (2012, background): “…2002) has progressively gained strong empirical support across a wide variety of behavioural domains (Dunn, Deroo & Rivara, 2001; Rubak, Sandbaek, Lauritzen, & Christenses, 2005), not only as a prelude to other treatment, but as a stand-alone treatment in its own right (Miller & Wilbourne, 2002).”
• Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006. (2007, methodology): “Consistent with the conventions used by Miller and Wilbourne (2002), less than 70% participant retention is noted as a limitation, and more than 80% retention is noted as a relative strength.”