t ¯ ± production and decay at NLO
By John M. Campbell, R. Ellis. 2012
202 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b1e3e953c7eef9f5fe6f9d1ac333774381cc253
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Cms Collaboration
- Atlas Collaboration
- S. Zambito
- G. Aad
- V. Khachatryan
- A. Sirunyan
- M. Aaboud
- Benjamin Nachman
Citations in the corpus
- Measurement of the differential cross section for top quark pair production in pp collisions at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin} (2015, methodology): “These are taken from NNLO (W+jets, Z+jets), NLO+NNLL (single top quark s-, t-, and tW channels [16]), NLO (diboson [26], tt +W [27], tt +Z [28]), and LO (QCD multijet [8]) calculations.”
- Search for the standard model Higgs boson produced in association with top quarks and decaying into a bb¯ pair in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector (2018, methodology): “The uncertainty of the tt̄V NLO cross-section prediction is 15% [96], split into PDF and scale uncertainties as for tt̄H.”
- Search for production of vector-like quark pairs and of four top quarks in the lepton-plus-jets final state in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV with the ATLAS detector (2015, background): “Uncertainties on the tt̄V and tt̄H normalisations are 30% and +9%/−12% respectively, from the uncertainties on their respective NLO theoretical cross sections [112, 120, 125].”
- Search for a standard model Higgs boson produced in association with a top-quark pair and decaying to bottom quarks using a matrix element method (2015, methodology): “[42] and [43] are used to normalise the ttW and ttZ samples, respectively.”
- Search for squarks and gluinos in events with isolated leptons, jets and missing transverse momentum at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV with the ATLAS detector (2015, background): “In addition to this, a generator uncertainty is applied, derived from comparing the nominal powheg diboson samples used in the dileptonic signal regions to samples generated with aMC@NLO [117], in both cases hadronised with Pythia.”
- The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations (2014, unknown): “Results are available in the literature for Wbb̄ [68, 313–316], Zbb̄ [68, 315, 317], tt̄γ [318], tt̄Z [68,319–322], tt̄W [68,322,323] production.”