HOW WELL DO ECOSYSTEM-BASED PLANNING UNITS REPRESENT DIFFERENT COMPONENTS OF BIODIVERSITY?

By Ralph Mac Nally, Andrew F. Bennett, G. Brown, Linda F. Lumsden, A. Yen, Simon D. Hinkley, P. Lillywhite, D. Ward. 2002

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Terrestrial invertebrate surveys and rapid biodiversity assessment in New Zealand: lessons from Australia (2004, background): “New Zealand Macroinvertebrate Working Group.”
Comparative influence of spatial scale on beta diversity within regional assemblages of birds and butterflies (2004, background): “As spatial scale increases, the strength of the correlation between floristics and physiognomy may also increase (Mac Nally et al., 2002).”
A Successful Predictive Model of Species Richness Based on Indicator Species (2004, background): “Fleishman, E., C. J. Betrus, R. B. Blair, R. Mac Nally, and D. D. Murphy.”
Conservation Planning and Biodiversity: Assembling the Best Data for the Job (2004, background): “Numbers of species and forest ecosystems given here have been reduced to account for those occurring in both subregions. bSee Gaston (1994) for review and Stattersfield et al. (1998) for example. cSee Donald and Fuller (1998) for review. dSee Margules and Austin (1994) and Freitag et al. (1996) for ”