Relative performance of a vibratory energy harvester in mono- and bi-stable potentials

By Ravindra Masana, Mohammed F. Daqaq. 2011

316 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7af23d25c09005679e91126bf645eb89d1ffacc5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

In Civil and Structural Engineering

In Mechanical Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Rotational energy harvesting using bi-stability and frequency up-conversion for low-power sensing applications: Theoretical modelling and experimental validation (2019, background): “However, the performance is severely affected by the operating modes [27,28].”
A Hybrid Nonlinear Vibration Energy Harvester (2017, methodology): “To increase the bandwidth, several methods introduced nonlinearities into the energy harvesting system [2] such as using stoppers to realize a spring hardening effect [3–5] and using axial static preload to stiffen or soften the structure [6,7].”
On the Role of Nonlinearities in Vibratory Energy Harvesting: A Critical Review and Discussion (2014, methodology): “21(c), Masana and Daqaq [78] further highlighted the influence of the potential shape in conjunction with the excitation level on the performance of bistable VEHs.”
Broadband tristable energy harvester: Modeling and experiment verification (2014, background): “Recently, the comparisons of monostable and bistable harvesters have received considerable interest due to different advantages of monostable and bistable piezoelectric harvesters under various excitation types and initial conditions [30–33].”
M-shaped asymmetric nonlinear oscillator for broadband vibration energy harvesting: Harmonic balance analysis and experimental validation (2014, background): “Furthermore, energy harvesters employing purely elastic [40–42] or magnetoelastic [30,34–36,38] buckling often require significantly large excitation levels (on the order of 1g) to fully exploit large-amplitude nonlinear dynamic phenomena.”