The Why and How of experimental pragmatics: The case of ‘Scalar Inferences’

By Ira A. Noveck, Dan Sperber. 2007

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7aebd495e30709749d304b2d0103a3b70b389fac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Ira A. Noveck
2. Guy Politzer

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Guy Politzer
2. Nausicaa Pouscoulous
3. A. Bastide
4. Ira A. Noveck
5. Dan Sperber
6. Gennaro Chierchia
7. Maria Teresa Guasti
8. Francesca Foppolo

In Language and Linguistics

1. Guy Politzer
2. Nausicaa Pouscoulous
3. A. Bastide
4. Ira A. Noveck
5. Gennaro Chierchia
6. Maria Teresa Guasti
7. Dan Sperber
8. Francesca Foppolo

Citations in the corpus

• A Developmental Investigation of Processing Costs in Implicature Production (2007, background): “While a scalar implicature makes the utterance more informative, it will typically involve extra effort (for more discussion, see Bott and Noveck (2004), Noveck (2004), and Noveck and Sperber (2007)).”
• Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition (2010, unknown): “The Gricean account of implicature derivation seems to be implausible from a cognitive and developmental point of view (Noveck and Sperber, 2007).”