Belief in Redeemability and Punitive Public Opinion: “Once a Criminal, Always a Criminal” Revisited
By A. L. Burton, F. Cullen, Velmer S. Burton,, Amanda Graham, Leah C. Butler, Angela J. Thielo. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 2020
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In 2009, Maruna and King presented results from a British survey showing that the public’s belief in the redeemability of people who committed offenses curbed their level of punitiveness. Based on a 2017 national survey in the United States (n = 1,000), the current study confirms that redeemability is negatively related to punitive attitudes. In addition, the analyses reveal that this belief predicts support for rehabilitation and specific inclusionary policies (i.e., ban-the-box in employment, expungement of criminal records, and voting rights for people with a felony conviction). Findings regarding measures for punishment and rehabilitation were confirmed by a 2019 Mechanical Turk (MTurk) survey. These results suggest that beliefs about capacity for change among people who committed offenses are key to understanding crime-control public policy.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ad8c5342cc00f5e0c86828e1f93df209af5d9db
Citations in the corpus
- Advantages of Matched Over Unmatched Opt-in Samples for Studying Criminal Justice Attitudes: A Research Note (2020, unknown): “, 2019), and offender redeemability (Burton et al., 2020).”