Look Black in Anger: The role of implicit prejudice in the categorization and perceived emotional intensity of racially ambiguous faces

By P. Hutchings, G. Haddock. 2008

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Research has demonstrated that individuals high in implicit prejudice are more likely to classify a racially ambiguous angry face as Black compared to individuals low in implicit prejudice [Hugenberg, K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2004). Ambiguity in social categorization. Psychological Science, 15, 342–345]. The current study sought to replicate and extend this finding by examining whether the same expression of anger on a racially ambiguous face is perceived to be differentially intense when the face is judged to be Black or White. White participants viewed racially ambiguous, White, and Black faces displaying angry, neutral, or happy emotions. Participants’ task was to identify the race, emotion, and intensity of emotion display. The results revealed that participants high in implicit prejudice reported significantly more of the racially ambiguous angry faces as Black compared to participants low in implicit prejudice. Further, participants high in implicit prejudice reported the intensity of the racially ambiguous angry emotion as greater when the same face had been categorized as Black compared to White. The results suggest that implicit prejudice is not only associated with the racial categorization of an ambiguous face but also the perceived intensity of the emotion displayed.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ad18ed7ba81ffa99df3c890a875864c5b174704

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Emotional mimicry: why and when we mimic emotions (2014, background): “In general, a negative attitude toward the target tends to inhibit emotional mimicry and increases the interpretation of the emotional signal as hostile (e.g., Hutchings & Haddock, 2008).”
Intergroup Perception and Cognition: An Integrative Framework for Understanding the Causes and Consequences of Social Categorization (2017, background): “This may seem surprising given the American cultural stereotype linking Blacks to aggression , and the multiple empirical demonstrations showing a Black-anger link (e.g., Hugenberg & Bodenhausen, 2003, 2004; Hutchings & Haddock, 2008; Kang & Chasteen, 2009; Kubota & Ito, 2014).”
The social face of emotion recognition: Evaluations versus stereotypes (2010, background): “More specifically, this research focused on the interplay between social categorization and recognition of emotional expressions (e.g. Becker, Kenrick, Neuberg, Blackwell, & Smith, 2007; Elfenbein & Ambady, 2002; Hugenberg, 2005; Hugenberg & Bodenhausen, 2003; Hutchings & Haddock, 2008).”