Efficient Top-k Query Evaluation on Probabilistic Data

By Christopher R'e, Nilesh N. Dalvi, Dan Suciu. IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, 2007

415 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Modern enterprise applications are forced to deal with unreliable, inconsistent and imprecise information. Probabilistic databases can model such data naturally, but SQL query evaluation on probabilistic databases is difficult: previous approaches have either restricted the SQL queries, or computed approximate probabilities, or did not scale, and it was shown recently that precise query evaluation is theoretically hard. In this paper we describe a novel approach, which computes and ranks efficiently the top-k answers to a SQL query on a probabilistic database. The restriction to top-k answers is natural, since imprecisions in the data often lead to a large number of answers of low quality, and users are interested only in the answers with the highest probabilities. The idea in our algorithm is to run in parallel several Monte-Carlo simulations, one for each candidate answer, and approximate each probability only to the extent needed to compute correctly the top-k answers.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7accedfb9bb0bc6706e61147e1950108923e88ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

  1. Ihab F. Ilyas
  2. Mohamed A. Soliman
  3. Xuemin Lin
  4. Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang
  5. Samuel Madden
  6. Jian Pei
  7. Aditya G. Parameswaran
  8. Hans-Peter Kriegel

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. Ihab F. Ilyas
  2. Mohamed A. Soliman
  3. Aditya G. Parameswaran
  4. Samuel Madden
  5. Jian Pei
  6. Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang
  7. C. Jermaine
  8. Neoklis Polyzotis

In Signal Processing

  1. Mohamed A. Soliman
  2. Ihab F. Ilyas
  3. Xuemin Lin
  4. Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang
  5. Samuel Madden
  6. Jian Pei
  7. Aditya G. Parameswaran
  8. Hans-Peter Kriegel

Citations in the corpus