False periodicities in quasar time-domain surveys

By S. Vaughan, P. Uttley, A. Markowitz, Daniela Huppenkothen, M. Middleton, W. Alston, J. Scargle, W. Farr. 2016

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

SV acknowledges support from STFC consolidated grant ST/K001000/1. WNA acknowledges support from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2013-2017) under grant agreement n.312789, StrongGravity. MJM acknowledges support from an STFC Ernest Rutherford fellowship. DH acknowledges support by the Moore–Sloan Data Science Environment at NYU. This research made use of NASA’s Astrophysics Data System. The CSS survey is funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Grant No. NNG05GF22G issued through the Science Mission Directorate Near-Earth Objects Observations Program. The CRTS survey is supported by the US National Science Foundation under grants AST-0909182 and AST-1313422

Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7acc2c550a725d01d0d28b0feb3773df8f408f92

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

Citations in the corpus

A Population of Short-Period Variable Quasars from PTF as Supermassive Black Hole Binary Candidates (2016, background): “On the other hand, Vaughan et al. (2016) generated mock DRW realizations to reassess the statistical significance of PG1302.”