A Systematic Review on Imbalanced Data Challenges in Machine Learning
By Harsurinder Kaur, Husanbir Singh Pannu, Avleen Kaur Malhi. ACM Computing Surveys, 2019
683 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In machine learning, the data imbalance imposes challenges to perform data analytics in almost all areas of real-world research. The raw primary data often suffers from the skewed perspective of data distribution of one class over the other as in the case of computer vision, information security, marketing, and medical science. The goal of this article is to present a comparative analysis of the approaches from the reference of data pre-processing, algorithmic and hybrid paradigms for contemporary imbalance data analysis techniques, and their comparative study in lieu of different data distribution and their application areas.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Health Information Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ac8f533a18f584387dd412a0a27feb9af1c5c93
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Johannes B Reitsma
- Karel G. M. Moons
- T. Debray
- M. van Smeden
- Lotty Hooft
- Steven W. J. Nijman
- E. Schuit
- Ewout W. Steyerberg
In Health Information Management
Citations in the corpus
- Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review (2022, background): “Often mentioned factors contributing to over fi tting are a small sample size in combination with many candidate features, perfect separation on rare categories, and a large imbalance resulting in a small number of events for one of the outcomes 6,47,49,72,76,77,82 .”
- A theoretical distribution analysis of synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) for imbalanced learning (2023, neutral): “Handling unbalanced data has been extensively studied in the literature (Japkowicz & Stephen, 2002; Kamalov et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2018; Haixiang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2021; Kaur et al., 2019).”