Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist
By Kate Raworth. 2017
411 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ac32a813594013068817e4ad9d93863b8a99ea6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- J. Steinberger
- Daniel W. O’Neill
- David Roubaud
- J. Vogel
- Muhammad Ali Nasir
- Andrew L. Fanning
- Tim Jackson
Citations in the corpus
- Socio-economic conditions for satisfying human needs at low energy use: An international analysis of social provisioning (2021, background): “…hence be crucial for achieving the twin goals of meeting everyone’s needs and remaining within planetary boundaries – goals which sit at the heart of the Sustainable Development Goals, but which are incompatible with current development pathways (Gough, 2017; O’Neill et al., 2018; Raworth, 2017).”
- Equity and sustainability in the Anthropocene: a social–ecological systems perspective on their intertwined futures (2018, background): “While ‘social equity’ (and gender equality) figure as part of the social foundations for a safe and just operating space [28], there has been little attempt to unpack the various dimensions of equity, nor to relate them systematically to sustainability.”
- Translating Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interdependencies into Policy Advice (2019, background): “Raworth’s doughnut seeks to combine an environmental ceiling beyond which Earth systems may become irreversibly unstable, based on the planetary boundaries approach [9], with a social foundation below which it is unjust for people to fall below.”
- A good life for all within planetary boundaries (2018, unknown): “Two quantities are shown: (1) the median level of resource use of the countries closest to each social threshold, and (2) the lowest level of resource use (that is, best performance) achieved by any country that meets the social threshold.”
- Analysing European Union circular economy policies: words versus actions (2020, unknown): “Increasing minimum mandatory guarntee periods from 2 to 3 or more years would also be necesary, as academics ( Bihouix, 2014 ; Latouche, 2009 ; Lazarevic and alve, 2017 ) and consumer groups have been asking 9 .”
- The political economy of car dependence: A systems of provision approach (2020, background): “ments, developing-world governments, and the EU have all used roadbuilding in an alleged attempt to address spatial economic inequalities [79,172,174,175].”
- The Sustainable Development Goals prioritize economic growth over sustainable resource use: a critical reflection on the SDGs from a socio-ecological perspective (2020, background): “This line of research is compatible with an idea of strong sustainability arguing that sustainability needs to enable human well-being for all while respecting ecological integrity (Raworth 2017), accepting that planetary boundaries pose absolute biophysical limits to societal activities beyond whic”
- Environmental degradation in France: The effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations (2018, background): “2.2 Economic Growth-Carbon Emissions Nexus Economic growth, often measured as the change in gross domestic product (GDP), has been the most crucial objective of macroeconomic policymaking, particularly in the post-WWII capitalist economies (Raworth, 2017) for interesting insight.”
- Traps and Sustainable Development in Rural Areas: A Review (2018, unknown): “…‘‘poverty in all its forms everywhere” (United Nations, 2015) while at the same time not increasing pressure on ecological resources and processes (Raworth, 2017; Steffen et al., 2015) is a long-standing challenge, most recently rearticulated as the first United Nations Sustainable Development…”
- The Post-growth Challenge: Secular Stagnation, Inequality and the Limits to Growth (2019, background): “…that has passed since the financial crisis of 2008, there has been a much more pronounced resurgence of interest in the growth critique from a variety of different perspectives (D'Alisa et al., 2014; O'Neill et al., 2018; Jackson, 2009, 2017; Raworth, 2017; Fioramonti, 2015; Victor, 2008/2018).”