inuences on judgement and choice

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The positive effect of negative emotions in protracted conflict: The case of anger (2011, background): “…as an individual-level phenomenon (Arnold, 1960) in which specific emotions are linked up with specific goals, cognitive appraisals of costs, benefits, and risks, and action tendencies aimed at achieving said goals (Lerner & Keltner, 2000, 2001; see also James, 1884; Scherer, 1984; Zajonc, 1998).”
Beyond Cognitive Framing Processes: Anger Mediates the Effects of Responsibility Framing on the Preference for Punitive Measures (2015, background): “Empirically, it is well established that emotions exert a strong influence on judgments (see for an overview Lerner & Keltner, 2000) and, as Nabi (2003) notes, it is thus plausible to assume that emotions are functionally equivalent to frame adoption.”
Exploring the role of incidental emotions in support for climate change policy (2015, methodology): “According to the appraisal-tendency framework (Lerner and Keltner 2000, 2001), once an incidental emotion is activated, it can shape perceptions of subsequent, irrelevant events, and guide ensuing behaviors in line with the central appraisal patterns characterizing that emotion.”