The Subaru FMOS galaxy redshift survey (FastSound). IV. New constraint on gravity theory from redshift space distortions at z ∼ 1.4

By T. Okumura, C. Hikage, T. Totani, Motonari Tonegawa, Hiroyuki Okada, Karl Glazebrook, C. Blake, Pedro G. Ferreira, S. More, A. Taruya and 15 more. 2015

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We measure the redshift-space correlation function from a spectroscopic sample of 2783 emission line galaxies from the FastSound survey. The survey, which uses the Subaru Telescope and covers the redshift ranges of $1.19<$z$<1.55$, is the first cosmological study at such high redshifts. We detect clear anisotropy due to redshift-space distortions (RSD) both in the correlation function as a function of separations parallel and perpendicular to the line of sight and its quadrupole moment. RSD has been extensively used to test general relativity on cosmological scales at $z<1$. Adopting a LCDM cosmology with the fixed expansion history and no velocity dispersion $\sigma_{\rm v}=0$, and using the RSD measurements on scales above 8Mpc/h, we obtain the first constraint on the growth rate at the redshift, $f(z)\sigma_8(z)=0.482\pm 0.116$ at $z\sim 1.4$ after marginalizing over the galaxy bias parameter $b(z)\sigma_8(z)$. This corresponds to $4.2\sigma$ detection of RSD. Our constraint is consistent with the prediction of general relativity $f\sigma_8\sim 0.392$ within the $1-\sigma$ confidence level. When we allow $\sigma_{\rm v}$ to vary and marginalize it over, the growth rate constraint becomes $f\sigma_8=0.494^{+0.126}_{-0.120}$. We also demonstrate that by combining with the low-z constraints on $f\sigma_8$, high-z galaxy surveys like the FastSound can be useful to distinguish modified gravity models without relying on CMB anisotropy experiments.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7aac72b89b4a9a17c4545288211ca107d955a45b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Will J. Percival
  2. D. Schneider
  3. C. Chuang
  4. J. Brownstein
  5. Daniel J. Eisenstein
  6. K. Dawson
  7. A. Ross
  8. J. Tinker

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. C. Chuang
  2. C. Yéche
  3. N. Palanque-Delabrouille
  4. Hélion Marie du Mas des Bourboux
  5. D. Schneider
  6. Will J. Percival
  7. J. Brownstein
  8. J. Tinker

Citations in the corpus